Hamid Mia (No. 3) v. Sakina Bibi @ Kazmanissa & ANR.

20.6.2022 AB Ct. No.6 CRR 359 of 2010 In Re : Hamid Mia (No. 3) None appears today even on the second call either on behalf of the petitioner or on behalf of the opposite parties. Record reveals that previously on 09.6.2022, 10.6.2022 and 16.6.2022 no one appeared in the matter when the matter was called on for hearing. Hence, the case record is taken up for delivering the order in absence of the parties.

This revision application has been filed by the petitioner in the year 2010.

On perusal of the records it appears the petitioner/husband has desired to espouse jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 by filing the instant revision petition, to challenge the judgment and order dated 20.11.2009 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 3rd Court at Asansol in Criminal Motion Case No. 11 of 2009 arising out of Miscellaneous Case No. 161 of 2007 and Miscellaneous Case No. 1 of 2008 respectively, thereby affirming the order of the Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court, Asansol dated May 26, 2008 in Miscellaneous Case No. 161 of 2007. The impugned order shows that the Court has dismissed the petitioner's case and upheld the order of the learned Magistrate dated May 26, 2008.

On perusal of the materials on records I am of the opinion that the grounds as made out in this case would not be enough to satisfy

this Court to interfere into the impugned order passed by the Court below as challenged in this revision petition. On the finding as above, I am inclined to dismiss the revision case being CRR 359 of 2010. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Connected application, if any, stands adjudicated with the case. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)