Tapas Mondal And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

10.03.2022 Serial no. 08 Dd CRM (A) 1098 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pandebeswar Police Station Case No. 14 of 2022 dated 30.01.2022 under Sections 341/323/325/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act corresponding to G.R. Case No. 178 of 2022.

-AndIn the matter of : Tapas Mondal & Ors. ... Petitioners Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. S. S. Imam, Mr. R. Jana, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the incident happened due to the disputes occurring at the work place.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary. Considering the nature of injury suffered by the victim and considering the fact that no arms were recovered from any of the petitioners, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid

down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till completion of investigation. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

CRM (A) 1098 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)