← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/769/2023allowed

Irsad Ali Mondal@Irsad Mondal@Arsad Ali Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

2023-02-23Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

23.02.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 769 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Patiram Police Station Case No. 182 of 2022 dated 16.09.2022 under Sections 21(b)/23(b)/27A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

And In Re : Irsad Ali Mondal @ Irsad Mondal @ Arsad Ali Mondal ...... petitioner Mr. Anindya Chowdhury ....for the petitioners Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta ....for the State Apparently, 18 grams of heroin was seized from the person arrested.

The petitioner is sought to be implicated on the basis of the statement of the co-accused.

Considering the materials in the case diary and the involvement of the petitioner in the incident, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a week till

the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)