Sudama Prasad Choudhury v. Bijin Krishna

05.02.2021 RP Ct.04 CPAN 153 of 2020 In WPA 20879 OF 2019 Mr. Sudama Prasad Choudhury Vs.

Bijin Krishna Mr. Debjit Mukherjee Mrs. Susmita Chatterjee Mr. Kaustav Bhattacharya .... For applicant Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Sureka .... For alleged contemner Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of alleged contemner and files affidavit of compliance. In it is disclosed reasoned order and revised bill. He tenders unqualified apology on behalf of his client for delayed compliance. Mrs. Chatterjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and submits, her client seeks direction for payment of bill amount in installment.

There can be no order in contempt jurisdiction apart from the matter of compliance or cognizance of contempt. As such, Court is satisfied there has been compliance and the apology is accepted. Applicant is at liberty to apply to the Corporation for relief of installments, to liquidate the bill amount.

The contempt application is, thus, disposed of. (ARINDAM SINHA, J.)