Shashthi Sarkar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A)1117 of 2022 (AD) 08.03.2022 Court No.29 ( Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Murshidabad P.S. Case No. 281 of 2016 dated 18/06/2016 under Sections 147/341/323/325/354/379/307 of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to GR No.1637 of 2016.

And In the matter of: Shashthi Sarkar & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Biswajit Sarkar Md. Bani Israil ...for the petitioners.

Mr. S.S. Imam Mr. Arabinda Manna ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the incident occurred due to the dispute with regard to cultivation. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report. In reply to a query from the Court, he submits that the police submitted charge sheet.

Considering the fact that the police submitted charge sheet and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties

of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below on every date fixed for hearing. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

C.R.M.(A) 1117 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)