Pronab Das v. State Of West Bengal

08.03.2022 Serial no. 14 Dd CRM (A) 1116 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Hili Police Station Case No. 253 of 2021 dated 09.11.2021 under Sections 341/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code(Corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1687 of 2021) -AndIn the matter of : Pronab Das ... ...Petitioner Ms. Busra Khatun, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Tanmay Kr. Ghosh, Ms. Sonali Bhar, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner summits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statements of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He submits that the petitioner poured oil over the victim and set him on fire. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein and considering the statements of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 1116 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)