← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/646/2026partly allowed

Osman Ai Mondal @ Usman Mondal And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

2026-03-12Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

12/03/2026 D/L - 35 Court No.28 S. Kundu Partly Allowed C.R.M.(A) 646 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Bishnupur P.S case no. 18 of 2026 dated 14/01/2026 under sections 85/118(1)/117(2)/76/3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of: Osman Ali Mondal @ Usman Mondal & Anr.

...Petitioners.

Mr. Soumik Ganguly Ms. Indrani Roy Ms. Priti Burman ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Anwar Hossain Mr. Rajas Jana ...for the State.

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. Perused the case diary.

3. Considering the materials available in the case diary including the injury report and the statements of witnesses especially the statement of the alleged victim recorded before the learned Magistrate, while I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no. 2 (Mojaffar Mondal @ Mozaffar Mondal @ Mojaffar Ali Mondal), the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 1 is rejected.

4. In the event of arrest, the petitioner no. 2 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom

must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the said petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The said petitioners shall meet the I.O once a fortnight till submission of report in final form.

5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed-in-part.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)