← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/642/2024allowed

Sahalam Malida And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2024-02-26Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

C.R.M. (A) 642 of 2024 26.02.2024 DL-22 Court No.29 (AD) (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kolaghat Police Station Case No. 535 of 2023 dated 21.08.2023 under Sections 341/323/325/307/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (G.R. Case No.2877 of 2023).

And In the matter of: Sahalam Malida & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Suman De ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Partha Pratim Das Sk. Arif Hossain ...for the State.

Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee Mr. Abhinaba Mukherjee ... for the de facto complainant.

Apparently, the persons involved in the incident of assault entered into negotiations.

De facto complainant does not object to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Police filed charge sheet.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to

secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. C.R.M. (A) 642 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)