Iklas Rahaman Faraji @ Aklach Rahaman Faraji And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 1190 of 2022 21.03.2022 Sl. 8 Court No.29 sourav (Partly Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 08.03.2022 in connection with Tehatta P. S. Case No. 45 of 2022 dated 13.01.2022 under Sections 498A/326/301/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Iklas Rahaman Faraji @ Aklach Rahaman Faraji & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Ms. Shalini Bairagi ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee Ms. Sonali Das ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein and considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no 1. However, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos. 2 and 3. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference

to this Court.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 1190 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)