Paresh Chandra Sardar v. State Of West Bengal & ORS

1733 & 1734 (ML) 24.01.2025 kaushik C.P.A.N. 1749 of 2024 in WPA 3442 of 2020 Paresh Chandra Sardar Vs.

Debabrata Paul Ms. Senjuti Sengupta Mr. R. Guha Thakurta Mr. Pulin Chandra Maity ... for the applicant.

Ms. Amrita Pandey ... for the Delta Limited.

Mr. Bipin Ghosh ... for the alleged contemnor.

Having heard Ms. Sengupta, learned advocate appearing in support of the contempt application, I direct service of the contempt application on the alleged contemnor. None appears on behalf of alleged contemnor.

Mr. Bipin Ghosh, learned advocate, who is present in Court, usually appears on behalf of the State, is directed to appear in this matter and a copy of the contempt application be served upon Mr. Ghosh by the learned advocate for the applicant. Let his appointment be regularized. The alleged contemnor is directed to file a report indicating whether the order dated 13th December, 2023 has been complied with or not.

Let this matter be taken up for further consideration in the Monthly List of March, 2025 under the heading 'Contempt Application'.

(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)