Jhantu Bhunya @ Abhisekh Bhuiya v. State Of West Bengal
CRM (A) 1211 of 2022 14.03.2022 Sl. 25 Court No.29 suvayan (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Serampore P.S. Case No. 434 of 2021 dated 18/11/2021 under Sections 341, 325, 308 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Jhantu Bhuiya @ Abhisekh Bhuiya. ....petitioner.
Ms. Soma Chowdhury (Bandhu) ...for the petitioners.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan ...for the State.
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the husband of the petitioner was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court.
Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report. He submits that the petitioner is principal assailant.
In response to query of the Court, learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the police filed chargesheet. Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the fact that father of the petitioner was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of
like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further conditions the petitioner shall appear before the court below on every date fixed for hearing.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.
CRM (A) 1211 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)