← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/736/2025allowed

Tonmay Haldar @ Tanmay Haldar v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-04-17Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

D/L58 17.04.2025 Rohit ct.no.34 C.R.M. (DB) 736 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedrue in connection with Chapra Police Station Case No.

of dated 6.10.2024 under sections 329(2)/118(2)/109/305 of the BNS, 2023 And In Re: Tonmay Haldar @ Tanmay Haldar

...Petitioner

Mr. Khalid Hasan ...for the petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Das Mr. Ratul Ghosh ...for the State The petitioner is in custody for about 185 days and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that chargesheet has been submitted. No recovery has been made from the petitioner. His further detention is not required. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. It appears that investigation has culminated in submission of charge-sheet.

The offending weapon has been recovered from the petitioner. No other recovery has been made from him. The victim was treated at Chapra BPHC and discharged. Further detention of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Accordingly, prayer for bail is allowed.

The petitioner namely Tonmay Haldar @ Tanmay Haldar shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount

each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia subject to condition that he shall remain outside the jurisdiction of Chapra police station and shall furnish the address where he shall presently reside before the learned Trial Court, the Investigating Officer and the Officer-inCharge of the concerned police station where he shall presently reside. The petitioner shall enter the jurisdiction of Chapra police station only for the purpose of appearing before the learned Trial Court on every date of hearing. He shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions stated above, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail being C.R.M. (DB) No. 736 of 2025 is, thus, disposed of. Case Diary be returned. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)