Prasenjit Samanta @ Khokan v. The State Of West Bengal

27.02.2024 Item No.24 Ct. No. 29 CHC Rejected C.R.M.(A) 672 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Raidighi Police Station Case No. 247/2023 dated 30.04.2023 under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Prasenjit Samanta @ Khokan ...... petitioner Mr. Sachit Talukdar, Mr. Kumar Bapuli ....for the petitioner Mr. Anand Keshari ....for the State Mr. Suranjan Mandal, Mr. Sandip Ganguly ....for the de facto complainant Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Police filed charge-sheet.

Eyewitness to an incident of murder, implicates the petitioner before us in such incident.

Considering the gravity of the offence and involvement of the petitioner as transpiring from the materials in the Case Diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. CRM(A) 672 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)