← Library
Calcutta High CourtCPAN/359/2025disposed

Arati Chakraborty v. Jagabandhu Banerjee Dist Ins Of Schools Pe And ANR

2025-07-23Hon'Ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha2 pages

23.07.2025 Court No.13 Item No.8 pk CPAN 359 of 2025 In WPA 8957 of 2017 Arati Chakraborty Vs.

Jagabandhu Banerjee and another Mrs. Bratati Dutta ... For the applicant/petitioner.

Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal ... For the DPPG 1.

It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that out of seven persons, who are legal heirs of the deceased pensioner, one person, namely, Prodyut Kumar Chakraborty, eldest son of the deceased, is not willing to come forward to the concerned Treasury Officer to submit documents to receive his share of terminal benefits. 2.

As a consequence of the above, the concerned Treasury Officer is not in a position to disburse terminal benefits to the other six persons including the widow. 3.

In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs 1/7 share of terminal benefits be paid equally to the six persons, who are willing to go to the concerned Treasury Officer and submit documents of identity and bank particulars. The share of Prodyut Kumar Chakraborty shall be returned back by the Treasury to the State.

4.

The full family pension and arrears shall, however, be payable exclusively to the widow, Arati Chakraborty upon production of all documents and particulars of bank account.

5.

The concerned Treasury Officer shall ensure strict compliance of the aforesaid order immediately upon receipt thereof.

6.

Copy of the P.P.O. is kept with the record.

7.

Hence, the contempt application is disposed of. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.

8.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)