← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/964/2025dismissed

Madhumita Halder And Another v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-09-12Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)2 pages

18.09.2025 Item No.03 Ct. No. 446 RP CRR 964 of 2025 In the matter of : Madhumita Halder & Anr.

... Petitioner Mr. Jayanta Banerjee Ms. Ruxmini B Roy ....For Petitioner

1. It is submitted by the learned advocate representing the petitioner that in the cause title portion of the judgment dated 12th September, 2025 the name of Mr. Jayanta Banerjee, learned Advocate alongwith Ms. Ruxmini B Roy, learned Advocate has wrongly been mentioned as the learned advocate representing the opposite party. Accordingly, the name of the learned advocates representing the petitioner ought to have been corrected and the name of Mr. Jayanta Banerjee, learned Advocate alongwith Ms. Ruxmini B Roy be read as the learned advocates appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, learned Advocate alongwith Mr. Raja Biswas, learned Advocate be read as the learned advocate representing the opposite party.

2. The cause title be read as MADHUMITA HALDER & ANR VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

instead of MADHUMITA.

3. In the seventh line of paragraph 1 of the judgment dated 12th September, 2025 the words "the present petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2 and ...." be read as "the opposite party no.2 to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month to the petitioner and ....".

4. Let the said corrections be deemed to stand incorporated in the judgment dated 12th September, 2025 for all practical purposes. The other portion of the said judgment dated 12th September, 2025 shall stand unaltered.

5. This order shall form part of the judgment dated 12th September, 2025.

(Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)