Faiz Ahmed v. The State Of West Bengal

06.03.2025 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 783 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Park Street Police Station Case No. 167 of 2024 dated 06.09.2024 under Sections 86/89/3(5)/351(2)/79/126(2)/115 of the BNS read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. And In Re : Faiz Ahmed ..... petitioner Mr. Tarique Quasimuddin Md. Faizan Yakub Md. Adnan Lodhi .....for the petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur, learned APP Mrs. Debjani Sahu ....for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits he is the husband of the victim. She suffers from psychiatric ailments. Petitioner has been falsely implicated. He prays for anticipatory bail.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State produces the case diary.

3.

We have considered the materials on record including the medical papers. Statements of witnesses and medical papers show victim was suffering from anxiety and psychiatric problems. Keeping in mind this fact we are of the opinion custodial interrogation is not necessary and he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that he shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)