Sarina Mondal v. State Of West Bengal & ORS

28.03.2025 Ct. No.33 Sl. No.12 cm WPA 2286 of 2016 Sarina Mondal vs.

Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Dinabandhu Chowdhury Mr. Amal Kumar Saha Ms. Iresh Paul ... for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Kumar Nandi Ms. Banani Bhattacharya ... for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2/UOI Mr. Surajit Auddy Ms. Swapnalekha Auddy ... for the respondent Nos. 3/SBI The affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let the same be kept on record.

The learned advocate representing the respondent Nos.3/SBI is granted liberty to correct the head note of the affidavit-in-opposition which was inadvertently stated as affidavit-in-reply. The affidavit-in-opposition so filed by the respondent Nos.3/SBI be kept on record.

A copy of the same has been served upon the learned advocate representing the petitioner. The learned advocate representing the petitioner intends to file affidavit-in-reply to the same and the same is allowed.

Let the matter be fixed on 19th May, 2025 for filing affidavit-in-reply.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)