← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/920/2023allowed

Tamrej Ali And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2023-03-02Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

02.03.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 920 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pukhuria Police Station Case No. 462 of 2022 dated 03.11.2022 under Sections 448/323/376/511/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Tamrej Ali & Anr.

...... petitioners Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. M. Alam Sk.

Mr. Susmita Ghorai ....for the petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Kaushik Kundu ....for the State The police complaint was lodged pursuant to an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Apparently, there are disputes relating to an immovable property. The husband was not accused by the de-facto complainant.

Materials in the case diary do not suggest requirement of custodial interrogation of the petitioners.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)