Arman Dafadar v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

31.03.2026 Serial no. 110 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 595 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with POCSO No. 11 of 2026 arising out of Nakashipara PS Case No. 1145 of 2025 dated 27.10.2025 u/s 137(2)/140(3)/3(5)/87 of the BNS, 2023 and under section 6 of the POCSO Act. -AndIn the matter of : Arman Dafadar ... Petitioner(s) Mr. Santanu Talukdar Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Ms. Shalini Baigari ... for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Shaila Afrin Ms. Smita Saha ... for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Sourav Mukherjee ... for the defacto-complainant Learned advocates for the petitioner, State and the defacto-complainant are present.

Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary.

I have taken into account the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS.

Having considered the same, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Arman Dafadar shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Krishnagar, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special court and shall not leave the district of Nadia without prior intimation to the learned Special court. Accordingly, CRM(M) 595 of 2026 is allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)