Ratan Chandra Das v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.
Form No. J.(2) Item No. 8 AB
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy W.P.A. 5224 of 2024 Sri Ratan Chandra Das Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
For the petitioner :
Ms. Susmita Dey (Basu), Advocate For State respondent :
Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, Ld. AGP Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal, Advocate Heard on :
August 6, 2025 Judgment on :
:
August 6, 2025 Aniruddha Roy, J.
Ms. Susmita Dey (Basu), learned advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, learned Additional Government Pleader with Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal, learned advocate appear for the respondents, the Calcutta State Transport Corporation.
The petitioner retired from service of CSTC on January 31, 2018. It is the case of the petitioner that he was an employee of CSTC since 1982. It is also the case of the petitioner that the Calcutta State Transport Corporation Employees'
Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 (in short, DCRB Scheme, 1990) was brought into operation on 22nd April, 1991 from a retrospective date of 1st April, 1984. The petitioner was an employee of CSTC when the said Regulations were promulgated. The petitioner opted for being governed by the provisions of the
General Provident Fund (GPF) Scheme under that Regulations. In any event, on the said Regulations coming into operation, all employees, who opted for being governed by the provisions of the said Regulations, had to be treated as an employee under the GPF Scheme. The petitioner says that despite such option, the petitioner was treated as an employee governed under the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme. Deductions were made from his salary by the employer and were deposited with the employer's contribution with the subject Provident Fund Authorities, which continued till the petitioner's retirement on January 31, 2018. The petitioner was, therefore, provided with the retiral benefits, which included the provident fund amount, gratuity and other benefits as per CPF Scheme.
The law is now well-settled in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court In the matter of : The Calcutta State Transport Corporation & Ors. vs. Ashit Chakraborty & Ors., reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 594 that, once an employee exercises his right to receive pension under the 1990 Regulations it was the duty of CSTC, the employer, to have given effect to the same. Merely because there were some wrong deductions from the salary of the employee and the said employee was treated as a member of CPF Scheme, the same cannot be permitted to be raised as a ground to defeat the rightful claim of the employee. In the instant case, once an option was exercised by the petitioner it was the duty of CSTC to treat the petitioner as a member of the GPF Scheme.
By making deductions and treating the petitioner to be under CPF Scheme will not defeat the petitioner's claim to receive pension under GPF Scheme.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner has to refund the excess money received on account of provident fund and gratuity with interest @ 6% per annum as the deduction under CPF Scheme is more than that under GPF Scheme towards employee's contribution. CSTC will provide the calculation as to the amount which has to be refunded by the petitioner with applicable interest computed @ 6% per annum by September 13, 2025.
The petitioner shall, immediately after receiving such computation, refund the money, if he is satisfied with the same. Subject to refund of money, CSTC shall provide pension to the petitioner at the applicable rate for the month of September, 2025, which falls due in October, 2025 and will thereafter continue to pay the monthly pension on regular basis. So far as arrears of pension is concerned, the same shall be paid by December 31, 2025 with interest computed on such arrears on and from the date it fell due till the actual date of payment. The interest payable on the arrears of pension shall be @ 6% simple interest per annum.
Nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. The same is accordingly disposed of, without any order as to costs. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)