Rajendra Kuamr Gupta And ORS. v. Rishi Agarwal

06.03.26 CO. 755 of 2026 Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Ors.

D/L Sl-37 Ct. 06 (Samar) v.

Rishi Agarwal Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Akash Adak, ... for the petitioners.

Mr. Debmalya Ghosal, Mr. Niladri Khanra, ... for the respondent.

1. This revisional application has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of an application for injunction filed in Title Suit No. 1365 of 2025 which is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court at Barasat, District - North 24 Parganas.

2. Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being prejudiced, because of the subsisting order of injunction, despite an application for vacation thereof having been filed on January 16, 2026. It is noticed that March 16, 2026 has been fixed by the learned Trial Court for hearing of the petition under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter "the Code").

3. Having regard to the nature of the case, the learned Trial Court is requested to dispose of the injunction application as well as the application under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

4. CO. 755 of 2026 stands disposed of. No costs.

5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities (Om Narayan Rai, J.)