Akbal Ansari v. C.E.S.C. Ltd.

18.08.2022 Item No. 174 Ct. No.40 Sayandeep CPAN 873 of 2006 Akbal Ansari Vs.

K.K. Kundu Deputy Manager in WPA 4389 of 2006 Mr. Debanjuan Mukherjee ...for the CESC None appears on the behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There will be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)