Piku Das Alias Haradhan Das v. State Of West Bengal

22.03.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1331 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No. 973 of 2021 dated 18.10.2021 under Sections 341/325/308/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Piku Das @ Haradhan Das ...... petitioner Mr. Amitabha Ghosh Ms. S. Mondal ....for the petitioner Mr. Abhra Mukherjee Mr. Goutam Banerjee ....for the State Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein and considering the injury report of the victim and considering the fact that another co-accused was granted bail by the Jurisdictional Court, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the

petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)