← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/967/2023allowed

Saddam Sk @ Saddam Ali @ Uday And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2023-03-13Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

13.03.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 967 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Halisahar Police Station Case No. 142 of 2022 dated 30.06.2022 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Saddam Sk. @ Saddam Ali @ Uday & Ors. ...... petitioners Mr. Koustav Bagchi Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Priti Kar ....for the petitioners Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. Bitasok Banerjee ....for the State Co-accused was enlarged on anticipatory bail by an order dated February 22, 2023 passed in CRM (A) 763 of 2023. The post mortem report of the victim suggests that the poison was administered to the victim.

The police filed charge-sheet, inter alia, under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 claiming that, the victim was lynched to death.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)