Lakshman Saha v. Samir Mukhopadhyay

C.R.R.721 of 2007 D/L41 July 18, Bpg.

In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;

Lakshman Saha

Versus

Samir Mukhapadhyay Ms. Priyanka Sarkar.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Anwar Hossain, Ms. Manisha Sharma.

...for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner do not intend to pursue with the present revisional application as it has been informed that during the pendency of the revisional application, the petitioner has expired.

As none appears on behalf of the State, Ms. Manisha Sharma, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. Her appointment may be regularised by the concerned authorities.

In view of the submissions advanced, CRR 721 of 2007 is dismissed as not pressed.

Pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.

Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)