Prasenjit Mondal @ Choto Bhai v. State Of West Bengal

01.05.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Rejected C.R.M. (DB) 853 of 2025 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Ghola Police Station Case No.565 of dated 02.10.2022 under Sections 394/397/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re :

Prasenjit Mondal @ Choto Bhai ... Petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta Ms. Sofia Nesar Mr. Santanu Sett ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Abhishek Sinha Mr. Aritra Bhattacharya ... for the State.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody for more than 2 years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was named by the co accused and the only incriminating material against him is that he purchased the mobile phone of the deceased. The mobile phone seized from his custody contains a SIM in his name.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. It appears that the offending weapon as well as other material connected to the case has been recovered pursuant to the leading statement of the petitioner and the co accused. The finger prints at the place of occurrence matched with that of the petitioner.

In view of the clinching evidence connecting him to the alleged offence, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage.

The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, in accordance with law.

The application for bail is thus disposed of. Case diary be returned.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)