Md Ahia And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

23.03.2022 Serial no.9 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 1343 of 2022 In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.03.2022 in connection with Bolpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2022 dated 18.01.2022 under Sections 307/363/365/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Md. Ahia & Ors.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Subrata Roy, Advocate Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Binay Panda, Advocate Mr. Subham Bhakat, Advocate ... ... For the State Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Advocate Mr. Swagata Biswas, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that they were falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to the medical report.

The de facto complainant is represented.

The statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure implicates the petitioners in the offence of assault as well as abduction. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners as transpiring from the materials available in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

CRM (A) 1343 of 2022 is rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)