Shanti Mridha @ Shantiranjan Mridha And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

10.03.2025 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 839 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 133 of 2025 dated 23.02.2025 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/3(5)/ 303(2)/79 of the BNS.

And In Re : Shanti Mridha @ Shantiranjan Mridha & Ors. ..... petitioners Mr. Asraf Mandal .....for the petitioners Mr. Subhamoy Bhattachrya Mr. Bikram Mitra ....for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits there was a fight between neighbours. They pray for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the materials on record including the injury reports. Though victim was hospitalized for three days injury reports do not disclose grievous injury. Under such circumstances we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that they shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)