← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1360/2022allowed

Bela Hansda @ Hasda And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-03-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

24.03.2022 Serial no.10 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 1360 of 2022 In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.03.2022 in connection with Balurghat P.S. Case No.577 of 2021 dated 13.10.2021 under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Bela Hansda @ Hasda & Ors. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury, Advocate Ms. Busra Khatun, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Avik Ghatak, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM (A) 1360 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)