← Library
Calcutta High CourtFMAT (ARBAWARD)/17/2022dismissed

Anjali Ghosh v. Rupa Roy (Chakraborty) And ORS

2022-04-21Hon'Ble Justice I. P. Mukerji,Hon'Ble Justice Aniruddha Roy2 pages

21.04.2022 Sl. 3 (Via Video Conference) Ct.No. 03 Amalranjan

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE FMAT (ARBAWARD)/17/2022 With CAN/1/2022 With CAN/2/2022 With CAN/3/2022 Anjali Ghosh Vs.

Rupa Roy (Chakraborty) & Ors.

(COMMERCIAL DIVISION) Mr. Tanmay Mukherjee Mr. Amal Kumar Saha Mr. Souvik Das Mr. Rudranil Das Mr. Soumyadip Panda ...for the appellant Mrs. Sohini Chakraborty ...for the respondent no.1 The distributorship agreement was between the Indian Oil Corporation and Mrs. Sohini Chakraborty's client, Smt.

Rupa Roy (Chakraborty). It was for distribution of gas and other products of the Corporation. It has an arbitration clause.

Disputes have arisen between Rupa Roy (Chakraborty) and the Indian Oil Corporation. The applicant Smt. Anjali Ghosh has an independent cause of action against Smt. Rupa Roy (Chakraborty).

It has no connection with the agreement between Rupa Roy (Chakraborty) and Indian Oil Corporation.

Moreover, the applicant is not a party to the said agreement.

It is true that this independent agreement between Smt. Anjali Ghosh has some effect on the performance of the other agreement. But that does not permit Smt. Anjali Ghosh to intervene in the arbitral proceeding between Smt. Rupa Roy (Chakraborty) and Indian Oil Corporation.

We do not grant leave to the applicant to intervene in this proceeding.

The application CAN 1 of 2022 seeking leave to file appeal is dismissed.

Consequently the other applications CAN 2 of 2022 and CAN 3 of 2022 are disposed of without passing any order.

The applicant is given leave to move an appropriate jurisdiction in respect of her alleged cause of action.

( Aniruddha Roy,J. ) ( I. P. Mukerji,J. )