M/S Satyam Construction & ANR v. Union Of India & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 4207 OF 2020 M/S. SATYAM CONSTRUCTION & ANR.

VS.

UNION OF INIDA & ORS.

MR. HIMANGSHU KUMAR RAY, ADVOCATE MS. SHIWANI SHAW, ADVOCATE MR. ANIMITRA ROY, ADVOCATE ......for the Petitioner MR. ANIRBAN RAY, LD. GP MR. T.M. SIDDIQUI, LD. AGP MR. T. CHAKRABORTY, ADVOCATE MS. S. SHAW, ADVOCATE MR. S. SANYAL, ADVOCATE ......for the State MR. UDAY SANKAR BHATTACHARYA, ADVOCATE MS. EKTA SINHA, ADVOCATE MS. BANANI BHATTACHARYA, ADVOCATE ......for the CGST Authority

1. Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray, Learned Advocate-onTHURSDAY Court : MB-07 Item : DL-23 Bench : SINGLE Matter : WPA Status : DAW ID : 266057 AR : NANDY record of the petitioner submits, on instruction, that his client does not want to proceed with the instant writ-petition and prays for withdrawal thereof.

2. The written instruction in this regard communicated to Mr. Ray by the petitioner, is taken on record.

3. In view thereof, WPA 4207 of 2020 is 'dismissed as withdrawn'.

(PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, J.)

P a g e | 2