Sanjeev Khandelwal v. Union Of India & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 4209 OF 2020 SANJEEB KHANDELWAL VS.

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

MR. HIMANGSHU KUMAR RAY, ADVOCATE MR. PIYAS CHOWDHURY, ADVOCATE MS. SHIWANI SHAW, ADVOCATE ......for the Petitioner MR. VIPUL KUNDALIA, SR. ADVOCATE MR. ANINDYA KANAN, ADVOCATE MR. DHIRODATTO CHAUDHURI, ADVOCATE ......for the CGST Authority MR. ANIRBAN RAY, LD. GP MR. T.M. SIDDIQUI, LD. AGP MR. T. CHAKRABORTY, ADVOCATE MS. S. SHAW, ADVOCATE MR. S. SANYAL, ADVOCATE ......for the State MR. SIDDHARTHA LAHIRI, ADVOCATE ......for the Union of India

1) Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray, learned Advocate TUESDAY Court : CB-07 Item : DL-03 Bench : SINGLE Matter : WPA Status : DAW ID : 266057 AR : NANDY representing the petitioner wants to avail of the benefit of Section 16(5) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and for this purpose he does not want to proceed with the instant writpetition. The written instruction in this regard, sent by the petitioner via email to the learned Advocate, as produced before this Court, is taken on record.

2) In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ-petition being WPA 4209 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn.

3) Interim order, if there be any, shall stand vacated.

4) Needless to state that the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail of the benefit of Section 16(5) of the WBGST Act, 2017 if he otherwise ready to avail of the same.

(PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, J.)

P a g e | 2