Mihir Das v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 862 of 2025 26.03.2025 DL-3 (AD) (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raiganj Police Station Case No.836 of 2024 dated 17.08.2024 under Sections 318(3)/318(4)/316(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, corresponding to G.R. No.1857 of 2024 pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Raiganj.

And In the matter of: Mihir Das ....petitioner.

Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. Sr. Advocate Mr. Krishan Ray, Advocate Mr. Souvik Das, Advocate Mr. Anamitra Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Akbar Laskar, Advocate ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Arindam Sen, Advocate Mr. Amanul Islam, Advocate ... for the State.

1. Petitioner and the State are represented.

2. None appears for the de facto complainant.

3. On the previous date, we noticed that, the petitioner promised to execute a registered document of title in favour of the de facto complainant through his wife.

4. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, such document of title was executed and registered.

5. Photocopies of such registration documents filed in Court be taken on record.

6. In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

8. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

9. C.R.M. (A) 862 of 2025 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)