Parsuram Goswami @ Mahendar v. State Of West Bengal

08.05.2025 jb.

jdt.

C.R.M. (DB) 919 of 2025 In Re : An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Labpur Police Station Case No. 65 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 363/392/394 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Parsuram Goswami @ Mahendar Mr. Shambhunath Roy Mr. Sharmistha Roychowdhury Ms. Amrita Tewari Ms. Rumki Guha Ms. Tuhina Parvin Ms. Pallabi Goswami Ms. Munmun Das ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Ranabir Roy Choudhury Mr. Aritra Bhattacharya ... For the State.

Learned counsel for the petitoiner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than a year and has no nexus with the alleged offence. The owner of an Ola cab was murdered and his vehicle robbed. There is no evidence connecting the petitioner to booking of the Ola cab or participation in the offence. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

Record reveals that the petitioner is an active member of an inter-State gang which commits robbery, dacoity and murder. The stolen vehicle was sold by the petitioner along with others. The identity card of the deceased was recovered from the petitioner's house pursuant to his leading statement.

Considering the prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)