← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/674/2009dismissed for default

Sahnaz Parveen @ Sahanaj Parvin v. State Of West Bengal & ANR.

2021-08-24Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay2 pages

20.03.2024 42 & 43 cm CRR 2810 of 2011 With CRAN 2/2014(Old No. CRAN 1591/2014) (Alam Ali Ahmed -vs- State of West Bengal & Anr.) In CRR 674 of 2009 ( Sahnaz Parveen @ Sahanaj Parvin Vs- State of West Bengal & Anr.) CRAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CRAN 1598/2014) With CRAN 2 of 2023 With CRAN 3 of 2023 Mr. Biswajit Manna .... for the petitioner in CRR 2810 of 2011.

Ms. Jeenia Rudra ... for the petitioner in CRR 674 of 2009 Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee ... for the State Ms. Jeenia Rudra ... for the opposite party No.2 in CRR 2810 of 2011 In Re: CRAN 3 of 2023 Heard the submission of the learned advocates for both the parties.

The application under Section 5 of the limitation Act has been taken up for hearing wherefrom it appears that there is a delay of 885 days and the same is condoned.

The application being CRAN 3 of 2023 is allowed. In Re: CRAN 2 of 2023 This is an application for restoration of a criminal revision by recalling the order of dismissal dated 24.08.2021.

On perusal of the averments made in the application it appears that sufficient cause has been made out, as to why the criminal revision was prevented for being represented on the day.

In view of the above, for the ends of justice, the restoration application being CRAN 2 of 2023 stands allowed. The criminal revisional application and connected application being CRAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CRAN 1598/2014) stands restored to its original file with number. Department is directed to serve copy of the revisional application upon the learned advocate for the State prior to the next date of hearing.

Let the matter be fixed on 5th April, 2024.

Copy of the order sent to the department for due compliance.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)