Kakali Mondal v. Ranjan Mondal And ANR.

12.03.26 CO 824 of 2026 Smt. Kakali Mondal v.

Ranjan Mondal & Anr.

Mr. Laskhminath Bhattacharya Mr. Subhankar Bose ... for the petitioner.

1. This revisional application has been filed seeking DL-21 Ct-06 (S.R.) expeditious disposal of an application for injunction filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedur in Title Suit No.162 of 2024 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Baruipur, South 24-Parganas.

2. Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has filed her written objection to the application for injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code, the injunction application has not yet been disposed of and the ad interim order of injunction that had been passed earlier is being kept extended from time to time.

3. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, prior service of notice of the revisional application along with a notice is not being directed, however, the petitioner shall remain obliged to serve a copy of the revisional application along with a copy of this order upon the opposite parties within a week from date.

4. Having heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and having perused the material on record, this revisional application is disposed of by requesting the learned Trial Court to dispose of the application for injunction as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

5. CO 824 of 2026 stands disposed of with the above observations. No Costs.

6. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible. (Om Narayan Rai, J.)