Suraj Debnath @ Suroj Debnath @ Palash v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 1418 of 2022 29.03.2022 Sl. 14 Court No.29 sourav (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.03.2022 in connection with Balurghat P. S. Case No. 459 of 2021 dated 25.08.2021 under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Suraj Debnath @ Suroj Debnath @ Palash ....petitioner.

Mr. Kallol Mondal, Mr. K. Roy, Mr. Arup Sarkar, Mr. Debayau Ghosh, Mr. Souvik Das, Mr. A. Banerjee, ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy, Ms. Sima Biswas, ...for the State.

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Considering the Post Mortem Report of the victim and considering the fact that the complaint was lodged by way of a petition under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the

jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 1418 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)