Central Bureau Of Investigation v. Srinjoy Bose

06.05.2024 Court No.237 pg.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 417 of 2015 Central Bureau of Investigation Vs.

Srinjoy Bose Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Dipanjan Dutt Mr. R. Ray Chowdhury Mr. Surojit Saha ... For the opposite party 1.

Seen the report of the department. From the report, it is found that administrative notice was served upon the petitioner. 2.

Learned advocate on behalf of the opposite party is present.

3.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner/CBI on call. This revisional application is pending since 2015. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with this revisional application any further.

4.

In such circumstances, the instant revisional application stands dismissed for default.

5.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

6.

Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. 7.

Department is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the learned Trial Court forthwith.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)