← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1438/2022allowed

Arsed Mondal @ Arshed Mondal And ORS v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2022-03-29Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

29.03.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1438 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 114 of 2022 dated 19.02.2022 under Sections 448/323/325/307/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Arsed Mondal @ Arshed Mondal & Ors.

...... petitioners Mr. Manas Kumar Das ....for the petitioners Ms. Anasuya Sinha Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra ....for the State Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners in the offences and considering the injury report of the victim, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigation Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the

jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)