← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/913/2023rejected

Badal Naskar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2023-03-14Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

14.03.2023 sdas rejected C.R.M. (DB) No. 913 of 2023 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kultali Police Station Case No. 1123 dated 20.02.2021 under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act and chargesheet submitted under Sections 376Ab/376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

And In Re : Badal Naskar ..... petitioner Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S. S. Saha ... for the petitioner Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta, learned APP Mr. Nirupam Dhali ... for the State Heard the learned Counsels for the parties We have considered the materials on record. Statement of the victim shows she was forcibly ravished by the petitioner. Victim is a minor. In view of gravity of the offence we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date preferably within six months from the next date fixed for recording evidence without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)