Pritam Ghosh And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

30.03.2022 Serial no. 39 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail Rejected) CRM(A) 1479 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 93 of 2020 dated 19.02.2020 under Sections 406/ 409 / 381 / 420 / 468 / 471/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Sri Pritam Ghosh & Ors. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ms. Sofia Nesar, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the branch manager was granted anticipatory bail by the jurisdictional Court. The petitioners were falsely implicated. The petitioners did not receive any repayment.

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the cashier-in-charge of the branch and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are the single window operators of the branch. The gold loan was disbursed to fictitious persons. The loans were granted on the basis of the so-called gold deposited with the Bank. The Bank is now without the so-called deposits of the gold. The petitioners are involved in the process of the disbursement. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring form

the materials in the case diary, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

CRM(A) 1479 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)