Ayub Ali Mir v. State Of West Bengal
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri CRR 898 of 2023 Ayub Ali Mir Vs.
The State of West Bengal Mr. Sourav Mondal Mr. Sikha Biswas ..for the petitioner Ms. Jonaki Saha ..for the State Item No.90 Heard & Judgment on:
11.04.2023 Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
This is an application for a direction upon the learned Special Judge (NDPS) Act, 6th Court at Barasat for expeditious disposal of NDPS Case No. 103 of 2021 under Section 21(c ) of the NDPS., Act. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested in connection with this case on 18th August, 2021. Since he is in custody, the Investigating Officer filed
supplementary charge sheet enclosing the chemical examination report of contraband articles on 16th October, 2021. Thereafter, the learned Judge framed charge against the accused on 18th January, 2023. There are eight witnesses to be examined on behalf of the prosecution. Out of them two witnesses have already been examined in part.
Considering the averment made in the instant revision this Court is of the view that the instant revision can be disposed of with the assistance of learned P.P.-in-charge. Accordingly, Ms. Jonaki Saha, learned advocate is requested to assist this Court on behalf of the prosecution.
Appointment of Ms. Jonaki Saha be regularized by the learned Legal Remembrancer, Government of West Bengal. Having heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned advocate for the State of West Bengal, this Court finds that the learned Special Judge, 6th Court at Barasat has already taken expeditious step for early disposal of the case. Only six witnesses are to be examined in the instant case. Therefore, I am not going to pass any time bound direction for disposal of the above mentioned NDPS case. However, the learned trial Judge is requested to take the same approach to dispose of the NDPS Case No. 103 of 2021 expeditiously. With the above order, the instant revision is disposed of.
The petitioner is at liberty to act on the server copy of the order.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)