← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/6635/2021disposed

Dipendra Nath Mondal v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2021-03-25Hon'Ble Justice Amrita Sinha3 pages

25.03.2021 SL No. 175 Court No.24 (P.M.) WPA 6635 of 2021 Dipendra Nath Mondal Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh ... for the petitioner Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, Mr. Simanta Kabir ... For the State.

The petitioner alleges illegal and unauthorised construction by the private respondents. The petitioner made a representation objecting to the aforesaid unauthorised construction to the Prodhan of the Gram Panchayet and complains that the same has not been considered by the respondent authority till date. None appears either on behalf of the Panchayet or the private respondent. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.

The learned advocate representing the State respondents submits, upon instruction received from the Officer-in-Charge of the Ramnagar Police Station, that at present no construction is being made by the private respondent.

As it appears that the representation of the petitioner objecting to the illegal and unauthorized construction is pending consideration at the end of the respondent

authorities, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the respondent no. 6, Prodhan, Bhadhura Haridas Gram Panchayat to consider and dispose of the representation made by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties, including the petitioner, at the earliest, but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of a copy of this order. The said respondent shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to all the necessary parties, including the petitioner, immediately thereafter.

In the event the aforesaid respondent is of the considered opinion that the construction has been made either in violation of the plan sanctioned or devoid the sanction plan, then necessary steps shall be taken to deal with such unauthorised construction, in accordance with law.

The aforesaid respondent shall restrict the consideration of the representation with regard to unauthorized construction only and not enter into or decide any private dispute of the parties regarding right, title and interest in respect of the aforesaid land.

It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and all points are

left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the representation of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation dated 5th January, 2021 to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

WPA 6635 of 2021 stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)