← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/950/2025rejected

Ajoy Roy v. State Of West Bengal

2025-05-13Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

May 13, 2025 15 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (DB) 950 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Jetia Police Station Case No. 182 of 2024 dated 11/11/2024 under Sections 103(2)/238 of the BNS.

And In Re :

Ajoy Roy ... Petitioner.

Adv. Subhrajyoti Ghosh ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Rituparna Ghose, Adv. Subhajit Chowdhury, ...for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than six months. He was not present at the place of occurrence at the relevant time and has no nexus with the alleged offence. The petitioner prays for bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. It appears that eye witness and the CCTV footage installer of the property in question have implicated the petitioner in the alleged offence. CCTV footage reveals that the petitioner was present at the spot when victim was beaten to death. The petitioner appears to be member of the gang who assaulted the petitioner resulting in his death. Considering the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)