Gopal Chandra Ghosh. v. Basudeb Banick.

19.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 460 of 1997 In WPA 20427 of 1996 Gopal Chandra Ghosh Vs.

Basudeb Banick ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)