Arman Sk. @ Arman Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

16.12.2021 sdas rejected C.R.M. 2451 of 2021 (via video conferencing) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Berhampore Police Station Case No. 620 of 2020 dated 29.06.2020 under Sections 376/370/372/373/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4/5/7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Sections 4/8/12/17 of the POCSO Act.

And In Re : Arman Sk. @ Arman Sekh ..... petitioner Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain ... for the petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed, learned APP Ms. Trina Mitra ... for the State We have seen the materials on record. Keeping in mind the gravity of the offence and as the petitioner does not stand on the same footing with the co-accused who has been enlarged on bail and the fact that delay in the trial is due to abscondence of the other accused persons, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

C.R.M. 192 of 2018 In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ..... petitioner Mr. Asraf Ali ... for the petitioner Mr. Debojyoti Deb ... for the State Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)