Tanzim Alam @ Mangly v. State Of West Bengal

04.04.2022 Serial no.46 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (DB) 884 of 2022 In re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.03.2022 in connection with Tiljala P.S. Case No. 300 of 2017 dated 04.12.2017 under Sections 302/394 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of: Tanzim Alam alias Mangly ... ...Petitioner Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. APP Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Roy, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioner seeks bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 4 years and 4 months. The petitioner was falsely implicated. He refers to the postmortem report and submits that the victim died out of natural causes.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the postmortem report of the victim. He submits that the victim suffered injuries including the two fractured ribs. The police obtained the opinion of the autopsy surgeon who stated that the death is homicidal in nature cannot be ruled out.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary including the postmortem report of the victim, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioner. CRM (DB) 884 of 2022 is rejected (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)