Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/943/2025dismissed as rejected

Harsh Agarwal v. State Of West Bengal

2025-03-19Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Smita Das De2 pages

19.03.2025 Item No.10 Ct. No. 26 CHC C.R.M.(A) 943 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Bidhannagar (North) Police Station Case No. 27 dated 18.02.2025 under Sections 127(4)/316(2)/318(4)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Harsh Agarwal ..... petitioner Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Sumanta Ganguly, Advocate Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Advocate ....for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Roy, Ld. Jr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate ....for the State

1. Materials in the Case Diary make out a case requiring investigation. Money went out from the complainant to the petitioner.

Role of the petitioner requires investigations.

2. Enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail will be inimical to the investigations.

3. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)