Paresh Chandra Sadhukhan v. Panu Mallick@Durgesh Mallick

18.12.2023 16.

Asr CO 340 of 2014 Paresh Chandra Sadhukhan

Versus

Panu Mallick @ Durgesh Mallick Petitioner is not represented.

None appears on behalf of the opposite parties. It appears that the instant revisional application is preferred challenging the impugned orders dated 9th January, 2014 and 28th January, 2014 passed by the learned Trial Court. From the report submitted by the office it appears that administrative notices were issued upon the petitioner in pursuance of the direction passed by the Court on earlier occasion. Despite receiving of the notices today the petitioner does not turn up. So it appears that the petitioner has lost his interest to proceed with the present application. So, there is no option left but to dismiss the present revisional application. Accordingly, the revisional application being CO/340/2014 is dismissed for default.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Prasenjit Biswas,J.)