← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/779/2012dismissed for non prosecution

Dhruv Agarwal v. Ashok Saraogi

2023-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay1 pages

29.08.2023 Sl.No. 23 Ct. 33 Amalranjan CRR 779 of 2012 Re. Dhruv Agarwal Mr. Avik Ghatak Ms. Afreen Begum...........for the petitioner Ms. Mamata Jana........for the defacto-complainant Mr. Binay Panda Mr. S.k. Bhakat Mr. P. Saha................for the State The petitioner Dhruv Agarwal is present in court. His personal appearance is noted and dispensed with. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits upon instruction that he has come to know that the accused, namely, Ashok Saraogi has expired, however, he is not in a position to submit death certificate to that effect. Learned advocate for the petitioner further files a written instruction on behalf of the petitioner stating his unwillingness to proceed with the matter. Let the said written instruction be kept with the record.

Accordingly, CRR 779 of 2012 is dismissed for nonprosecution. ( Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J. )